Abstract

Flexible barriers are essential passive measures which are able to protect human life, structures and infrastructures from rockfall hazards. When a barrier is impacted, a significant portion of energy dissipation is concentrated in targeted components, named brakes, which can be replaced after the rockfall event. Several technologies exist, differing in both constitutive elements and energy dissipation mechanisms, but experimental data are generally restricted by producers. The present paper compares the various technologies thanks a new efficiency index, that is the ratio between the component potentially dissipated energy and its weight. To analyse the effects of the design parameters, four of the most common brakes are analytically modelled. It is shown that the performance of the devices is variable and depends on the working mechanism and the adopted material. In particular, plastic deformation energy dissipation induced by buckling is generally more efficient than the one caused by bending. Finally, a discussion on the force that activates the brake is proposed. The proposed analyses are of paramount importance for the conceptual design of new energy dissipation devices in rockfall risk mitigation structures.